|
Home
Alaska Whistleblower Resource Guide
About Us
Staff
Board
Do you support the work of the Alaska Forum? Become
a member!
| |
Alaska Whistleblower Resource
Guide
Finding Legal Help
Regardless of whether your whistleblowing leads to a lawsuit, a well-informed and
sympathetic attorney can offer guidance throughout the process-and can help you avoid
serious missteps. An attorney can help you prevent reprisals from occurring in the first
place, through supervising and monitoring your disclosure through the safest channels. If
retaliation is inevitable, an attorney can ensure that you are on solid legal ground by
screening your disclosure to provide an expert opinion on whether it is "legally
protected speech." Otherwise you may forfeit your rights: if you say too much or do
not have enough corroborating evidence, what you intend as whistleblowing may not qualify
for legal protection.
Be careful in choosing and working with an attorney; this is a partner on whom your
professional future may depend. Remember, too, that although your attorney's legal advice
is important, decisions about whether to remain silent or speak out are ultimately yours
to make: it is you, not your attorney, who will live with the consequences of your
choices.
Some specific tips on securing effective legal representation from GAP's handbook are
provided below.
- For referrals, contact groups and individuals who have experience with employment
attorneys.
Contact the Alaska Forum, GAP or other public interest groups for
suggestions. Also, traditional sources such as the local bar association or relevant
committees of the American Bar Association can help identify respected specialists. Your
local public library should have a copy of the lawyer's directory, Martindale-Hubbell,
which describes specialists under a variety of cross-references. When seeking referrals,
ask for attorneys whose expertise is wrongful discharge. If that fails to produce an
adequate list, broaden the scope to employment law.
- Before even talking to a prospective lawyer, take time to summarize your story in
writing.
Be concise: limit yourself if possible to less than two single-spaced, typed
pages and certainly less than five. Take your time preparing this document. Your case
summary supplies an attorney's first impression of you and your communications skills. It
also allows the attorney to test your credibility by questioning you based on your
statement. Stick to the facts and avoid unnecessary rhetoric. Be sure to discuss any
special circumstances you may face: whistleblowing with a government security clearance,
for example, poses particular problems. Be ready to identify solid candidates as
supporting witnesses and explain how they can help. Also, compile a list of relevant
documents currently or potentially available. It takes a near-miracle to win without
either strong supporting testimony or documentary evidence.
- Remember that a primary goal of your initial interview is to build the attorney's
confidence in your prospects for winning.
Prospective lawyers may be wary of someone
who immediately cross-examines them on too wide a range of topics: remember that the
attorney needs to form an overall first impression of you. Before you get serious about
signing a retainer, however, you must know where you both stand on a range of issues-so
you will need to ask questions, including some of those discussed below.
- Confirm that the attorney-client privilege applies to what you discuss, and check for
conflicts of interest.
Before sharing information, ensure that the lawyer will not
reveal information without your consent. Then, even if you have confirmed the
confidentiality of discussions, check for conflicts of interest. Before your introductory
meeting, check the list of "representative clients" in Martindale Hubbell. (Old
copies may have more complete listings.) If you see any potential conflicts of interest,
ask the attorney about them before you disclose confidential information.
- Learn the attorney's track record in handling cases similar to yours, such as win-loss
records and significant precedents or benefits obtained for other clients.
There is
nothing rude about simply asking; you can also request references. Another way to gather
this information is to review public court documents, such as briefs and relevant judicial
decisions in similar cases that the attorney has handled.
- Make clear your goals and objectives.
One common reason that attorney-client
relationships sour is that each entered the partnership with differing expectations. An
essential step in deciding on an attorney is to know and communicate your own
expectations. This includes not only matters involving the attorney's representation, but
also matters concerning the larger public policy issue that triggered your whistleblowing.
Legal organizations and individual attorneys vary tremendously in their values, priorities
and work styles. Some lawyers, for example, will be uncomfortable if you keep speaking out
publicly about your whistleblowing charges during the lawsuit. Others will support your
ongoing public activism. Similarly, one firm may be appropriate for a whistleblower who
wishes to settle a dispute quietly, while another would better serve a whistleblower whose
goal is to have his or her day in court.
- Clarify your financial burdens and options from the outset.
Before meeting with a
prospective attorney, find out if there is a fee for the initial consultation, and if so,
what it is. If you do not ask, you may find yourself unable to afford up to four-figure
composite bills incurred in your effort to make an informed choice. Once you establish a
relationship with an attorney, be sure to discuss and agree on your financial
obligations-and then meet them.
- Clarify time commitments.
Find out how much time the attorney has and will commit
to. At the same time, determine how much time and effort the attorney expects from you as
a participant in preparing your case. Some attorneys prefer their clients to be functional
partners, while others view the same client initiatives as interference.
- Get a commitment on how much notice you will receive of developments, information and
decisions that make a difference for your case.
It can be poison for a working
relationship and fatally undermine a client's rights if an attorney withholds key
developments. On the other hand, it is unrealistic to expect a lawyer to do his or her job
if s/he must review daily developments with each client. Facilitate a relationship of
trust that you both can count on by establishing this balance up front.
- Pin down your role in any settlement negotiations.
The great majority of cases
settle before trial. Request advance notice of proposals before they are made or of offers
from the other side before any response is issued, and pin down the attorney's willingness
to respect your authority as the final decisionmaker in the settlement. A client is in a
position of comparative weakness if an attorney threatens to quit unless settlement terms
are accepted on the eve of trial. Remember, though, that your lawyer is the partner on
your team with unique expertise. Most of us have an unrealistic expectation of what we
deserve to achieve in a settlement, which is-by definition-a compromise in which both
parties will be partially disappointed.
When you sign a retainer agreement, remember that it is a
contract. Read the terms carefully to make sure they reflect any informal agreements
reached on items listed above or from your own checklist. If you don't understand a term,
ask the attorney to explain it and to replace the "legalese" with an English
translation you understand. If the attorney balks, consider that a warning.
Next chapter: "Alaska-Specific
Information" Table of
Contents
|