`Neo-Plasticism'(a name by which de Stijl is alternately known) rejected figuration as the goal of art and replaced it with the pared-down vocabulary of elemental shapes and primary colours, thereby allowing art to express its own `plastic' language free of the concerns of representation. The artist in this environment became less author of a subjective artwork than the agent of a universal harmony. The depesonalisation of the artwork was carried through into the execution which was anonymous and impersonal, as in Mondrian's `Composition with Red, Yellow and Blue' (1930); although many De Stijl paintings are abstractions of natural phenomena, such as van Doesburg's `Rhythms of a Russian Dance' (1918).
In the 1920s, while Mondrian's work adhered to the strict principles of Neo-Plasticism, van Doesberg sought to broaden the influence of the movement into architecture. The austere forms of De Stijl were well suited to the geometric structures favoured by the >International Modernist movement, while the primary colours favoured by the painters could be used as decorative elements to articulate an otherwise plain facade, as in Oud's `Caf‚ De Unie' in Rotterdam (1925). Likewise, Rietveld's `Red and Blue Chair' (1917), painted in primary colours and revealing its structure, offers itself for analysis like a Mondrian painting.
The principles of De Stijl art and design had considerabble influence on the >Bauhaus in the 1920s, and after Mondrian's emmigration to New York in 1940, the U.S.A.
P. Overy, De Stijl (1969); K. Frampton, `De Stijl, in T. Richardson, and N. Stangos, (eds.) Concepts of Modern Art (1974); De Stijl: 1917-1931, Visions of Utopia (1982); N. J. Troy, The De Stijl Environment (1983); C. Blotkamp et al. De Stijl: The Formative Years [1982] (1986).